This site is a static rendering of the Trac instance that was used by R7RS-WG1 for its work on R7RS-small (PDF), which was ratified in 2013. For more information, see Home.

Source for ticket #273

cc


    

changetime

2011-09-23 23:45:53

component

WG1 - Core

description

In the section <Output>, in the description of `write', we say:

  Symbols that contain non-ASCII characters are escaped either with inline hex escapes or with vertical bars.

Is this right?  Shouldn't implementations that support Unicode be allowed to write symbols that contain non-ASCII characters without treating them specially?

The invariant we want to establish is that `read' can read what `write' has written.

The question for this ticket is whether the standard should require that that invariant hold only in the same implementation, or across implementations.

If we stick with the existing language, we get interoperability across implementations.

If we change the language to allow any non-whitespace character supported by the implementation to be written unescaped and without vertical bars, we lose interoperability across implementations, but gain the ability of the implementation to display symbols containing Unicode characters in a natural manner.

id

273

keywords


    

milestone


    

owner

alexshinn

priority

major

reporter

aag

resolution

wontfix

severity


    

status

closed

summary

Decide whether the presence of non-ASCII characters in symbols requires escaping or using vertical bars when output by `write'.

time

2011-08-29 18:48:22

type

defect

Changes

Change at time 2011-09-23 23:45:53

author

cowan

field

comment

newvalue


    

oldvalue

5

raw-time

1316796353000000

ticket

273

time

2011-09-23 23:45:53

Change at time 2011-09-23 23:45:53

author

cowan

field

resolution

newvalue

wontfix

oldvalue


    

raw-time

1316796353000000

ticket

273

time

2011-09-23 23:45:53

Change at time 2011-09-23 23:45:53

author

cowan

field

status

newvalue

closed

oldvalue

new

raw-time

1316796353000000

ticket

273

time

2011-09-23 23:45:53

Change at time 2011-09-23 23:45:35

author

cowan

field

comment

newvalue

I'm closing this ticket because we no longer have to decide this.

oldvalue

4

raw-time

1316796335000000

ticket

273

time

2011-09-23 23:45:35

Change at time 2011-08-30 06:09:14

author

cowan

field

comment

newvalue

UnicodeCowan 15 doesn't fly; it winds up assigning the pname "a\\xbb0;b" to the symbol a\xbb0;b as well as a\x5c;xbb0\x3b;b, which is intolerable.

So I withdraw my objections.

oldvalue

3

raw-time

1314659354000000

ticket

273

time

2011-08-30 06:09:14

Change at time 2011-08-30 04:46:21

author

cowan

field

comment

newvalue

Alex is mistaken as things stand.  See #274.

oldvalue

2

raw-time

1314654381000000

ticket

273

time

2011-08-30 04:46:21

Change at time 2011-08-30 03:57:38

author

aag

field

comment

newvalue

Alex points out:

If some other implementation doesn't support the Greek
subset of Unicode, then they wouldn't support it even
if it were escaped.

oldvalue

1

raw-time

1314651458000000

ticket

273

time

2011-08-30 03:57:38