This site is a static rendering of the Trac instance that was used by R7RS-WG1 for its work on R7RS-small (PDF), which was ratified in 2013. For more information, see Home.
Source for ticket #286
cc
changetime
2012-10-05 12:23:41
component
WG1 - Core
description
`Real-valued?`, `rational-valued?`, and `integer-valued?` test whether a given number object can be coerced to the specified type without loss of numerical accuracy. They are equivalent to the versions of `real?`, `rational?`, and `integer?` that existed in R5RS.
Specifically, the behavior of these predicates differs from the behavior of `real?`, `rational?`, and `integer?` on complex number objects whose imaginary part is inexact zero.
These procedures provide R6RS base compatibility as well.
id
286
keywords
milestone
owner
cowan
priority
major
reporter
cowan
resolution
fixed
severity
status
closed
summary
Numeric *-valued procedures for R5RS and R6RS-base compatibility
time
2011-09-23 00:12:33
type
defect
Changes
Change at time 2012-10-05 12:23:41
author
cowan
field
comment
newvalue
oldvalue
4
raw-time
1349414621029084
ticket
286
time
2012-10-05 12:23:41
Change at time 2012-10-05 12:23:41
author
cowan
field
resolution
newvalue
fixed
oldvalue
raw-time
1349414621029084
ticket
286
time
2012-10-05 12:23:41
Change at time 2012-10-05 12:23:41
author
cowan
field
status
newvalue
closed
oldvalue
writing
raw-time
1349414621029084
ticket
286
time
2012-10-05 12:23:41
Change at time 2012-04-09 22:34:57
author
cowan
field
comment
newvalue
oldvalue
3
raw-time
1333985697860724
ticket
286
time
2012-04-09 22:34:57
Change at time 2012-04-09 22:34:57
author
cowan
field
owner
newvalue
cowan
oldvalue
alexshinn
raw-time
1333985697860724
ticket
286
time
2012-04-09 22:34:57
Change at time 2012-04-09 22:34:57
author
cowan
field
status
newvalue
writing
oldvalue
decided
raw-time
1333985697860724
ticket
286
time
2012-04-09 22:34:57
Change at time 2012-04-09 21:58:56
author
cowan
field
comment
newvalue
The WG voted to reject the additional procedures and to roll back the regular procedures to the R5RS definitions.
oldvalue
2
raw-time
1333983536970301
ticket
286
time
2012-04-09 21:58:56
Change at time 2012-04-09 21:58:56
author
cowan
field
status
newvalue
decided
oldvalue
new
raw-time
1333983536970301
ticket
286
time
2012-04-09 21:58:56
Change at time 2011-09-23 23:56:22
author
cowan
field
comment
newvalue
oldvalue
1
raw-time
1316796982000000
ticket
286
time
2011-09-23 23:56:22
Change at time 2011-09-23 23:56:22
author
cowan
field
summary
newvalue
Numeric *-valued procedures for R5RS and R6RS-base compatibility
oldvalue
R6RS base compatibility: *-valued procedures
raw-time
1316796982000000
ticket
286
time
2011-09-23 23:56:22
Change at time 2011-09-23 23:56:22
author
cowan
field
description
newvalue
`Real-valued?`, `rational-valued?`, and `integer-valued?` test whether a given number object can be coerced to the specified type without loss of numerical accuracy. They are equivalent to the versions of `real?`, `rational?`, and `integer?` that existed in R5RS.
Specifically, the behavior of these predicates differs from the behavior of `real?`, `rational?`, and `integer?` on complex number objects whose imaginary part is inexact zero.
These procedures provide R6RS base compatibility as well.
oldvalue
`Real-valued?`, `rational-valued?`, and `integer-valued?` test whether a given number object can be coerced to the specified type without loss of numerical accuracy. Specifically, the behavior of these predicates differs from the behavior of `real?`, `rational?`, and `integer?` on complex number objects whose imaginary part is inexact zero.
These procedures provide R6RS base compatibility, as well as being the versions of `real?`, `rational?`, and `integer?` that existed in R5RS.
raw-time
1316796982000000
ticket
286
time
2011-09-23 23:56:22