This site is a static rendering of the Trac instance that was used by R7RS-WG1 for its work on R7RS-small (PDF), which was ratified in 2013. For more information, see Home.

Source for ticket #34

cc


    

changetime

2011-01-24 08:12:56

component

WG1 - Core

description

New to R5RS, do we reaffirm multiple values?

id

34

keywords


    

milestone


    

owner

alexshinn

priority

major

reporter

alexshinn

resolution

wontfix

severity


    

status

closed

summary

multiple values

time

2010-02-23 17:07:47

type

defect

Changes

Change at time 2011-01-24 08:12:56

author

cowan

field

comment

newvalue


    

oldvalue

7

raw-time

1295827976000000

ticket

34

time

2011-01-24 08:12:56

Change at time 2011-01-24 08:12:56

author

cowan

field

resolution

newvalue

wontfix

oldvalue


    

raw-time

1295827976000000

ticket

34

time

2011-01-24 08:12:56

Change at time 2011-01-24 08:12:56

author

cowan

field

status

newvalue

closed

oldvalue

reopened

raw-time

1295827976000000

ticket

34

time

2011-01-24 08:12:56

Change at time 2011-01-24 08:12:42

author

cowan

field

comment

newvalue


    

oldvalue

6

raw-time

1295827962000000

ticket

34

time

2011-01-24 08:12:42

Change at time 2011-01-24 08:12:42

author

cowan

field

resolution

newvalue


    

oldvalue

fixed

raw-time

1295827962000000

ticket

34

time

2011-01-24 08:12:42

Change at time 2011-01-24 08:12:42

author

cowan

field

status

newvalue

reopened

oldvalue

closed

raw-time

1295827962000000

ticket

34

time

2011-01-24 08:12:42

Change at time 2010-10-18 02:33:28

author

cowan

field

comment

newvalue

The WG voted to reaffirm multiple values as part of the core.

oldvalue

5

raw-time

1287344008000000

ticket

34

time

2010-10-18 02:33:28

Change at time 2010-10-18 02:33:28

author

cowan

field

resolution

newvalue

fixed

oldvalue


    

raw-time

1287344008000000

ticket

34

time

2010-10-18 02:33:28

Change at time 2010-10-18 02:33:28

author

cowan

field

status

newvalue

closed

oldvalue

new

raw-time

1287344008000000

ticket

34

time

2010-10-18 02:33:28

Change at time 2010-05-02 23:57:20

author

cowan

field

comment

newvalue

I also support adding LET-VALUES and LET*-VALUES from SRFI 11, which make multiple values easier to use.

oldvalue

4

raw-time

1272819440000000

ticket

34

time

2010-05-02 23:57:20

Change at time 2010-03-18 10:46:47

author

cowan

field

comment

newvalue

I favor putting them in an optional module (which exports VALUES and CALL-WITH-VALUES), so that Thing One implementations do not *have* to support them, but if they do, will support them in a standard way.

oldvalue

3

raw-time

1268884007000000

ticket

34

time

2010-03-18 10:46:47

Change at time 2010-03-18 10:41:10

author

arcfide

field

comment

newvalue

Yes. In the absence of an alternative proposal that is as effectual as multiple values, I would argue for their continued existence. 

oldvalue

2

raw-time

1268883670000000

ticket

34

time

2010-03-18 10:41:10

Change at time 2010-03-16 05:13:56

author

kumoyuki

field

comment

newvalue

No. There is a better way.

oldvalue

1

raw-time

1268691236000000

ticket

34

time

2010-03-16 05:13:56

Change at time 2010-03-16 05:13:56

author

kumoyuki

field

milestone

newvalue


    

oldvalue


    

raw-time

1268691236000000

ticket

34

time

2010-03-16 05:13:56