This site is a static rendering of the Trac instance that was used by R7RS-WG1 for its work on R7RS-small (PDF), which was ratified in 2013. For more information, see Home.
Source for ticket #34
cc
changetime
2011-01-24 08:12:56
component
WG1 - Core
description
New to R5RS, do we reaffirm multiple values?
id
34
keywords
milestone
owner
alexshinn
priority
major
reporter
alexshinn
resolution
wontfix
severity
status
closed
summary
multiple values
time
2010-02-23 17:07:47
type
defect
Changes
Change at time 2011-01-24 08:12:56
author
cowan
field
comment
newvalue
oldvalue
7
raw-time
1295827976000000
ticket
34
time
2011-01-24 08:12:56
Change at time 2011-01-24 08:12:56
author
cowan
field
resolution
newvalue
wontfix
oldvalue
raw-time
1295827976000000
ticket
34
time
2011-01-24 08:12:56
Change at time 2011-01-24 08:12:56
author
cowan
field
status
newvalue
closed
oldvalue
reopened
raw-time
1295827976000000
ticket
34
time
2011-01-24 08:12:56
Change at time 2011-01-24 08:12:42
author
cowan
field
comment
newvalue
oldvalue
6
raw-time
1295827962000000
ticket
34
time
2011-01-24 08:12:42
Change at time 2011-01-24 08:12:42
author
cowan
field
resolution
newvalue
oldvalue
fixed
raw-time
1295827962000000
ticket
34
time
2011-01-24 08:12:42
Change at time 2011-01-24 08:12:42
author
cowan
field
status
newvalue
reopened
oldvalue
closed
raw-time
1295827962000000
ticket
34
time
2011-01-24 08:12:42
Change at time 2010-10-18 02:33:28
author
cowan
field
comment
newvalue
The WG voted to reaffirm multiple values as part of the core.
oldvalue
5
raw-time
1287344008000000
ticket
34
time
2010-10-18 02:33:28
Change at time 2010-10-18 02:33:28
author
cowan
field
resolution
newvalue
fixed
oldvalue
raw-time
1287344008000000
ticket
34
time
2010-10-18 02:33:28
Change at time 2010-10-18 02:33:28
author
cowan
field
status
newvalue
closed
oldvalue
new
raw-time
1287344008000000
ticket
34
time
2010-10-18 02:33:28
Change at time 2010-05-02 23:57:20
author
cowan
field
comment
newvalue
I also support adding LET-VALUES and LET*-VALUES from SRFI 11, which make multiple values easier to use.
oldvalue
4
raw-time
1272819440000000
ticket
34
time
2010-05-02 23:57:20
Change at time 2010-03-18 10:46:47
author
cowan
field
comment
newvalue
I favor putting them in an optional module (which exports VALUES and CALL-WITH-VALUES), so that Thing One implementations do not *have* to support them, but if they do, will support them in a standard way.
oldvalue
3
raw-time
1268884007000000
ticket
34
time
2010-03-18 10:46:47
Change at time 2010-03-18 10:41:10
author
arcfide
field
comment
newvalue
Yes. In the absence of an alternative proposal that is as effectual as multiple values, I would argue for their continued existence.
oldvalue
2
raw-time
1268883670000000
ticket
34
time
2010-03-18 10:41:10
Change at time 2010-03-16 05:13:56
author
kumoyuki
field
comment
newvalue
No. There is a better way.
oldvalue
1
raw-time
1268691236000000
ticket
34
time
2010-03-16 05:13:56
Change at time 2010-03-16 05:13:56
author
kumoyuki
field
milestone
newvalue
oldvalue
raw-time
1268691236000000
ticket
34
time
2010-03-16 05:13:56