This site is a static rendering of the Trac instance that was used by R7RS-WG1 for its work on R7RS-small (PDF), which was ratified in 2013. For more information, see Home.
Source for ticket #395
cc
changetime
2012-08-27 07:16:13
component
WG1 - Core
description
Currently both `infinite?` and `nan?` return `#t` to a complex number like `+inf.0+nan.0i`. Is this the Right Thing, or should `infinite?` only return `#t` if neither part is a NaN?
id
395
keywords
milestone
owner
alexshinn
priority
major
reporter
cowan
resolution
wontfix
severity
status
closed
summary
Infinite and NaN complex numbers
time
2012-05-30 07:10:02
type
defect
Changes
Change at time 2012-08-27 07:16:13
author
cowan
field
comment
newvalue
oldvalue
2
raw-time
1346026573700488
ticket
395
time
2012-08-27 07:16:13
Change at time 2012-08-27 07:16:13
author
cowan
field
resolution
newvalue
wontfix
oldvalue
raw-time
1346026573700488
ticket
395
time
2012-08-27 07:16:13
Change at time 2012-08-27 07:16:13
author
cowan
field
status
newvalue
closed
oldvalue
decided
raw-time
1346026573700488
ticket
395
time
2012-08-27 07:16:13
Change at time 2012-08-25 00:35:45
author
cowan
field
comment
newvalue
WG1 decided to make no change.
oldvalue
1
raw-time
1345829745918793
ticket
395
time
2012-08-25 00:35:45
Change at time 2012-08-25 00:35:45
author
cowan
field
status
newvalue
decided
oldvalue
new
raw-time
1345829745918793
ticket
395
time
2012-08-25 00:35:45