474: Syntax-rules definition of cond-expand needed

SRFI 0 might be a source, but a quick look at it suggests "not really".

cowan

2012-10-08 23:14:43

description␣SRFI 0 might be a source, but a quick look at it suggests "not really".

statusnewdecided

arcfide

2012-10-12 03:43:11

I have sent an email to the list with a possible implementation, but I have not yet received any comments.

cowan

2012-10-15 04:55:25

resolution␣fixed

statusdecidedclosed

I went with the SRFI-0 definition.

Ticket 474: Syntax-rules definition of cond-expand needed