Should we allow => in case clauses (including the else clause)? This allows you to pass the item actually matched to a procedure, analogous to the use of => in cond clauses, which passes the non-#f value to a procedure.
Example (from SRFI 87):
(case (get-symbol) ((true) #t) ((false) #f) (else => (lambda (x) x)))This maps true to #t, false to #f, and leaves everything else alone.
WG1 voted to accept this.