This site is a static rendering of the Trac instance that was used by R7RS-WG1 for its work on R7RS-small (PDF), which was ratified in 2013. For more information, see Home.

Source for wiki HashTablesCowan version 55

author

axch

comment

ipnr

98.110.161.12

name

HashTablesCowan

readonly

text

== Hash tables ==

This WG2 proposal defines an interface to hash tables, which are widely recognized as a fundamental data structure for a wide variety of applications.  A hash table is a data structure that:

   * Is disjoint from all other types.
   * Provides a mapping from objects known as ''keys'' to corresponding objects known as ''values''.
     * Keys may be any Scheme objects in some kinds of hash tables, but are restricted in other kinds.
     * Values may be any Scheme objects.
   * Has no intrinsic order for the key-value ''associations'' it contains.
   * Provides an ''equivalence predicate'' which defines when a proposed key is the same as an existing key.  No table may contain more than one value for a given key.
   * Provides a ''hash procedure'' which maps a candidate key into a non-negative exact integer.
   * Supports mutation as the primary means of setting the contents of a table.
   * Assumes that keys are immutable; mutating a key leads to unspecified behavior.
   * Provides key lookup and destructive update in (expected) amortized constant time, provided a satisfactory hash procedure is given.
   * Does not guarantee that whole-table operations work in the presence of concurrent mutation.

== Issues ==

 1. I've heard complaints about the messiness of passing two arguments, one of which is optional, when creating a hash table.  What about having a procedure that accepts an equivalence predicate and a hash procedure, and returns a procedure that behaves the same as the equivalence predicate when called with two arguments, but when called with zero arguments, returns the hash procedure?  This is used to create hash tables, saving an extra argument each time.  Note that this style allows the author of an equivalence predicate to provide hashing without cluttering up the interface, and allows the predicate to be provided as transparently as built-in predicates are.  (This idea was suggested by early reviewer kpreid.)  Something like this was proposed as an enhancement to Common Lisp as [http://cdr.eurolisp.org/document/2/genhash.html CDR 2].

 2. What if we did not support arbitrary equivalence predicates, but only allowed `eq?`, `eqv?`, `equal?`, and `string=?` (hash tables that support `equal?` will also support `string=?`).  We could further allow `string-ci=?` as an optional ("should") equivalence predicate.  This would allow us to support more Scheme implementations and eliminate any need to deal with hash procedures, though it is a considerable restriction on generality.  I'd like feedback on how often such generality is actually required.

== Rationale ==

Hash tables themselves don't really need defending: almost all dynamically typed scripting languages, from awk to JavaScript to Lua to Perl to Python to Common Lisp, have them in some form as a very basic data structure.  Therefore, what needs to be defended is not the data structure but the procedures.  The present proposal is at an intermediate level.  It supports a great many convenience procedures on top of the basic hash table interfaces provided by [http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-69/srfi-69.html SRFI 69] and [http://www.r6rs.org/final/html/r6rs-lib/r6rs-lib-Z-H-14.html R6RS].  Nothing in it adds power to what those interfaces provide, but it does add convenience in the form of pre-debugged routines to do various common things, and even some things not so commonly done but useful.

There is no mandated support for thread safety, immutability, or weakness, though there is a semi-portable hook for specifying these features.


=== SRFI 69 compatibility ===

The names used in the present proposal are mostly derived from SRFI 69, with the following changes:

* The `hash-table-exists?` procedure seems to ask if its argument is an existing hash table.  It has been renamed `hash-table-contains?`, as in R6RS.

* The `hash-table-walk` procedure places the hash table argument first and the walker procedure second.  It has been renamed `hash-table-for-each` and given the same argument order as `for-each`, `string-for-each`, and so on.  However, unlike those procedures it can only accept one hash table: coordinated access to multiple hash tables is meaningless, given that hash tables are unordered.

* The `hash-table-merge!` procedure has been renamed `hash-table-union!`, since it causes the first hash table to become the union of the two hash table arguments.  A third argument specifying how to merge the values has been added.

=== R6RS compatibility ===

The relatively few hash table procedures in R6RS are all available in the present proposal under somewhat different names.  The present proposal adopts SRFI 69's term `hash-table` rather than R6RS's `hashtable`, because of the universal use of "hash table" rather than "hashtable" in other languages and in technical prose generally.  Besides, the English word ''hashtable'' obviously means something that can be ... hashted.

In addition, the `hashtable-ref` and `hashtable-update!` of R6RS correspond to the `hash-table-ref/default` and `hash-table-update!/default` of both SRFI 69 and the present proposal.

It would be trivial to provide the R6RS names (or for that matter the SRFI 69 names) on top of the present proposal.  The only substantive difference is that R6RS `hashtable-values` and `hashtable-entries` return vectors, whereas in the present proposal `hash-table-values` and `hash-table-entries` return lists.

=== Reflection and hash-function procedures ===

SRFI 69 provides reflective procedures that, given a hash table, returns its equivalence predicate and hash procedure, as well as procedures that expose the implementation's hash procedures suitable for the equivalence predicates `eq?`, `equal?`, `string=?`, and `string-ci=?`.  The second of these can also be used for `eqv?`.  However, if the `eq?` hash procedure directly exposes the address of the key, and the garbage collector moves the hash table, it must also rehash its keys.  In such implementations, the `hash-by-identity` procedure is not idempotent, which makes it dangerous to use outside the context of implementation-provided hash tables.

R6RS eliminates this issue by providing separate constructors for `eq?` and `eqv?` hash tables, and refusing to expose the hash functions for them.  However, the presents proposal takes the radical option of providing neither reflection nor implementation-based hash functions.  They can of course be provided by implementations as extensions with suitable warnings against inappropriate uses.

=== Common Lisp compatibility ===

As usual, the Common Lisp names are completely different from the Scheme names. Common Lisp provides the following capabilities that are not in the present proposal:

* The constructor allows specifying the current capacity (as opposed to size), rehash size, aand rehash threshold of the new hash table.  There are also accessors and mutators for these.

* There are hash tables based on `equalp` (which is not in Scheme).

* `With-hash-table-iterator` is a hash table external iterator implemented as a local macro.

* `Sxhash` is a stable hash function.

=== Sources ===

The procedures in the present proposal are drawn primarily from SRFI 69, R6RS, and the native hash tables of [http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/hashtables.html Racket].  In addition, the following sources are acknowledged:

* The `hash-table-push!` and `hash-table-pop!` procedures are from [http://practical-scheme.net/gauche/man/gauche-refe_53.html Gauche].

* The `hash-table-find` procedure is from [http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~gambit/doc/gambit-c.html#Tables Gambit].

* The procedures `hash-table-set-entries!` and `hash-table-set-entries` are inspired by the [http://clhs.lisp.se/Body/f_pairli.htm Common Lisp] function `pairlis`.

* The procedures `hash-table-unfold` and `hash-table-count` were suggested by [http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-1/srfi-1.html SRFI 1].  

* The procedures in the section "Hash tables as functions" were loosely inspired by the finite functions of [https://code.google.com/p/owl-lisp/wiki/OwlManual#Finite_Functions Owl Lisp].

The procedures `hash-table-replace!`, `hash-table-replace!/default`, `hash-table-search!`, `hash-table-intersection!`, and `hash-table-difference!` were added for completeness. 

The native hash tables of [http://web.mit.edu/scheme_v9.0.1/doc/mit-scheme-ref/Hash-Tables.html MIT],  [http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/Hash-Table-Reference.html Guile], [http://sisc-scheme.org/manual/html/ch09.html#Hashtables SISC], [http://www-sop.inria.fr/indes/fp/Bigloo/doc/bigloo-7.html#Hash-Tables Bigloo], [http://s48.org/0.57/manual/s48manual_44.html Scheme48], [http://www.cs.indiana.edu/scheme-repository/SCM/slib_2.html#SEC13 SLIB], [http://www.rscheme.org/rs/b/0.7.3.4/5/html/c2143.html RScheme], [https://ccrma.stanford.edu/software/snd/snd/s7.html#hashtables Scheme 7], [https://github.com/barak/scheme9/blob/master/lib/hash-table.scm Scheme 9], [http://www.fifi.org/cgi-bin/info2www?(librep)Hash+Tables Rep], and [https://code.google.com/p/femtolisp/wiki/APIReference FemtoLisp] were also investigated, but no additional procedures were incorporated.

=== Pronunciation ===

The slash in the names of some procedures can be pronounced "with".

=== Acknowledgements ===

Some of the language of the present proposal is copied from SRFI 69 with thanks to its author, Panu Kalliokoski.  However, he is not responsible for what I have made of it.

== Specification ==

The procedures in the present proposal are in the `(scheme hash-tables)` and `(srfi xxx)` libraries (or `(srfi :xxx)` on R6RS).  However, the library in the sample implementation is named `(hash-tables)`.

All references to "executing in expected amortized O(1) time" presuppose that a satisfactory hash procedure has been supplied by the user.  Arbitrary or non-idempotent hash procedures can make a hash of the implementation.

Hash tables are allowed to cache the results of calling the equivalence and hash procedures, so programs cannot rely on the hash procedure being called exactly once for every primitive hash table operation: it may be called zero, one, or more times.

No procedure passed to `hash-table-find`, `hash-table-count`, `hash-table-map`, `hash-table-for-each`, `hash-table-update-each!`, `hash-table-map->list`, or `hash-table-fold` may mutate the hash table being walked, with the exception of changing the value of the association currently being processed.

Here is an index to the procedures of this specification:

* [#Constructors Constructors]: `make-hash-table`, `hash-table`

* [#Predicates Predicates]: `hash-table?`, `hash-table-contains?`, `hash-table=?`

* [#Accessors Accessors]: `hash-table-ref`, `hash-table-ref/default`

* [#Mutators Mutators]: `hash-table-set!`, `hash-table-set-all!`, `hash-table-set-entries!`, `hash-table-set-alist!`, `hash-table-delete!`, `hash-table-delete-keys!`, `hash-table-extend!`, `hash-table-extend!/default`, `hash-table-replace!`, `hash-table-replace!/default`, `hash-table-update!`, `hash-table-update!/default`, `hash-table-search!`

* [#Thewholehashtable The whole hash table]: `hash-table-clear!`, `hash-table-size`, `hash-table-keys`, `hash-table-values`, `hash-table-entries`, `hash-table-find`, `hash-table-count`

* [#Mappingandfolding Mapping and folding]: `hash-table-map`, `hash-table-for-each`, `hash-table-update-each!`, `hash-table-map->list`, `hash-table-fold`, `hash-table-unfold`

* [#Copyingandconversion Copying and conversion]: `hash-table-copy`, `hash-table->alist`, `alist->hash-table`

* [#Hashtablesasfunctions Hash tables as functions]: `hash-table-accessor`, `hash-table-accessor/default`, `hash-table-mutator`, `hash-table-deleter`, `hash-table-extender`, `hash-table-extender/default`, `hash-table-replacer`, `hash-table-replacer/default`, `hash-table-updater`, `hash-table-updater/default`

* [#Hashtablesassets Hash tables as sets]: `hash-table-union!`, `hash-table-intersection!`, `hash-table-difference!`

* [#Exceptions Exceptions]: `hash-table-not-found?`

=== Constructors ===

`(make-hash-table `''equivalence'' [ ''hash'' ] [ ''arg'' ... ]`)`

Returns a newly allocated hash table whose equivalence predicate is ''equivalence'' and hash procedure is ''hash''.  The equivalence predicate accepts two arguments and returns a truth value.  The hash procedure accepts one argument in the domain of the equivalence predicate and returns a non-negative exact integer.  It is the programmer's responsibility to ensure that two objects passed to the hash procedure return the same value if the same objects passed to the equivalence predicate return true; however, the converse is not required.

The ability to omit the ''hash'' argument is severely limited.  If ''equivalence'' is `eq?`, `eqv?`, `equal?`, `string=?`, or `string-ci=?`, a suitable implementation-provided procedure will be used.  The implementation may extend this list.  But if any other equivalence predicate is provided without a hash procedure, an error should be signaled.

The meaning of the remaining arguments is implementation-dependent.  However, implementations which support the ability to specify the initial capacity of a hash table should interpret a non-negative exact integer as the specification of that capacity.  In addition, if the symbols `immutable`, `thread-safe`, `weak-keys` or  `weak-values` are present, implementations should create immutable hash tables, mutable thread-safe hash tables, hash tables with weak keys, and hash tables with weak values respectively.  In an implementation which does not support these features, an error should be signaled if they are requested.  To avoid collision with the ''hash'' argument, none of these arguments can be procedures.

(SRFI 69 `make-hash-table`; R6RS `make-eq-hashtable`, `make-eqv-hashtable`, and `make-hashtable`; Common Lisp `make-hash-table`)

`(hash-table `''equivalence hash'' ( ''key value'' ) ...`)`

Returns a newly allocated hash table, created as if by `make-hash-table`, whose equivalence procedure is `equivalence` and hash procedure is `hash`.  For each pair of arguments, an association is created in the new hash table with ''key'' as its key and ''value'' as its value.

=== Predicates ===

`(hash-table? `''obj''`)`

Returns `#t` if ''obj'' is a hash table, and `#f` otherwise.  (SRFI 69 `hash-table?`; R6RS `hashtable?`; Common Lisp `hash-table-p`)

`(hash-table-contains? `''hash-table key''`)`

Returns `#t` if there is any association to ''key'' in ''hash-table'', and `#f` otherwise.  Must execute in expected amortized O(1) time.  (SRFI 69 `hash-table-exists?`; R6RS `hashtable-contains?`)

`(hash-table=? `''value= hash-table,,1,, hash-table,,2,,''`)`

Returns `#t` if ''hash-table,,1,,'' and ''hash-table,,2,,'' have the same keys (in the sense of their common equivalence predicate) and the same values (in the sense of the ''value='' predicate) for each key, and `#f` otherwise.  It is an error to compare two hash tables that have distinct equivalence predicates.

=== Accessors ===

The following procedures, given a key, return the corresponding value.

`(hash-table-ref `''hash-table key'' [ ''failure'' [ ''success'' ] ]`)`

Extracts the value associated to ''key'' in ''hash-table'', invokes the procedure ''success'' on it, and returns its result.  Otherwise, invokes the procedure ''failure'' on no arguments and returns its result.  If ''success'' is not provided and is required, the value itself is returned.  If ''failure'' is not provided but is required, an error that satisfies `hash-table-not-found?` is signaled.  Must execute in expected amortized O(1) time, not counting the time to call the procedures.  (SRFI 69 `hash-table-ref`)

`(hash-table-ref/default `''hash-table key default''`)`

Semantically equivalent to, but may be more efficient than, the following code:
  `(hash-table-ref `''hash-table key'' `(lambda () `''default''`))`

((SRFI 69 `hash-table-ref/default`, R6RS `hashtable-ref`; Common Lisp `gethash`)

=== Mutators ===

The following procedures alter the associations in a hash table either unconditionally, or conditionally on the presence or absence of a specified key.

`(hash-table-set! `''hash-table key value''`)`

Creates a new association in ''hash-table'' that associates ''key'' with ''value''.  If there is a previous association for ''key'', it is deleted.  It is an error if ''hash-table'' is not a valid argument to the equality predicate of ''hash-table''.  Returns an unspecified value.  Must execute in expected amortized O(1) time.  (SRFI 69 `hash-table-set!`; R6RS `hashtable-set!`)

`(hash-table-set-all! `''hash-table'' ( ''key value'' ) ...`)`

Repeatedly mutates ''hash-table'', setting each ''key'' to the ''value'' that follows it.

`(hash-table-set-entries! `''hash-table keys values''`)`

Repeatedly mutates ''hash-table'', setting each element of ''keys'' to the corresponding element of ''values''.

`(hash-table-set-alist! `''hash-table alist''`)`

Repeatedly mutates ''hash-table'' using the associations of ''alist''.

`(hash-table-delete! `''hash-table key''`)`

Deletes any association to ''key'' in ''hash-table'' and returns true if there was an association for ''key'', false if not.  Must execute in expected amortized O(1) time.    (SRFI 69 `hash-table-delete!`; R6RS `hashtable-delete!`; Common Lisp `remhash`)

`(hash-table-delete-keys! `''hash-table keylist''`)`

Semantically equivalent to, but may be implemented more efficiently than, the following code:

  `(for-each (lambda (key) (hash-table-delete `''hash-table''` key)) `''keylist''`)`

`(hash-table-extend! `''hash-table key'' [ ''failure'' [ ''success'' ] ]`)`

Invokes `hash-table-ref` with the given arguments and returns what it returns.  If ''key'' was not found in ''hash-table'', its value is set to the result being returned.

`(hash-table-extend!/default `''hash-table key default''`)`

Invokes `hash-table-ref/default` with the given arguments and returns what it returns.  If ''key'' was not found in ''hash-table'', its association is set to the result being returned.

`(hash-table-replace! `''hash-table key failure'' [ ''success ]`)`

Invokes `hash-table-ref` with the given arguments and returns what it returns.  If ''key'' was found in ''hash-table'', its value is set to the result being returned.

`(hash-table-replace!/default `''hash-table key default''`)`

Invokes `hash-table-ref/default` with the given arguments and returns what it returns.  If ''key'' was found in ''hash-table'', its value is set to the result being returned.

`(hash-table-update! `''hash-table key updater'' [ ''failure'' [ ''success ] ]`)`

Semantically equivalent to, but may be implemented more efficiently than, the following code:

  `(hash-table-set! `''hash-table''` `''key''` (`''updater'' `(hash-table-ref `''hash-table''` `''key failure success''`)))`

Must execute in expected amortized O(1) time.  Returns an unspecified value.  (SRFI 69 `hash-table-update!/default`; R6RS `hashtable-update!`)

`(hash-table-update!/default `''hash-table key updater default''`)`

Semantically equivalent to, but may be implemented more efficiently than, the following code:

  `(hash-table-set! `''hash-table''` `''key''` (`''updater'' `(hash-table-ref/default `''hash-table''` `''key default''`)))`

Must execute in expected amortized O(1) time.  Returns an unspecified value.  (SRFI 69 `hash-table-update!`)

`(hash-table-push! `''hash-table key value''`)`

Semantically equivalent to, but may be implemented more efficiently than, the following code:

  `(hash-table-update!/default `''hash-table key''` (lambda (x) (cons `''value''` x)) '())

`(hash-table-pop! `''hash-table key''`)`

If an association with ''key'' is found in ''hash-table'', then return the car of the value, and update the value to its own cdr.  If the value is not found or is not a pair, signal an error.

`(hash-table-search! `''hash-table key failure success''`)`

Search ''hash-table'' for ''key''.  If it is found, invoke the ''success'' procedure with
one argument, a unary ''add!'' procedure which if invoked will insert a new association between ''key'' and its argument.  If ''key'' is not found, invoke the ''failure'' procedure with three arguments: the value found, a unary ''set!'' procedure that updates the association to have the value specified as its argument, and a nullary ''delete!'' procedure that deletes the association.  Returns whatever ''success'' or ''failure'' returns, as the case may be.

=== The whole hash table ===

`(hash-table-clear! `''hash-table''`)`

Delete all the associations from ''hash-table''.  Should execute in expected amortized O(1) time.  (R6RS `hashtable-clear!`; Common Lisp `clrhash`)

`(hash-table-size `''hash-table''`)`

Returns the number of associations in ''hash-table'' as an exact integer.  Should execute in expected amortized O(1) time.  (SRFI 69 `hash-table-size`, R6RS `hashtable-size`; Common Lisp `hash-table-count`.)

Return number of keys in hash-table.

`(hash-table-keys `''hash-table''`)`

Return list of all keys in an unspecified order. (SRFI 69 `hash-table-keys`; R6RS `hashtable-keys` returns a vector)

`(hash-table-values `''hash-table''`)`

Return list of all values in an unspecified order, not necessarily the same order as hash-table-keys. (SRFI 69 `hash-table-values`)

`(hash-table-entries `''hash-table''`)`

Returns two values, the list of keys in an unspecified order and the list of values in the corresponding order.  (R6RS `hash-table-entries` returns vectors)

`(hash-table-find `''hash-table proc''`)`

For each association of ''hash-table'', invoke ''proc'' on its key and value in an unspecified order.   If ''proc'' returns true, then return the value.  If ''proc'' always returns `#f`, return `#f`.

`(hash-table-count `''hash-table pred''`)`

For each association of ''hash-table'', invoke ''pred'' on its key and value in an unspecified order.  Return the number of calls to ''pred'' which returned true.

=== Mapping and folding ===

`(hash-table-map `''equivalence hash proc merger hash-table''`)`

Returns a newly allocated hash table as if by `make-hash-table`.  Calls ''proc'' for every association in ''hash-table'' with two arguments: the key of the association and the value of the association.  The two values returned by ''proc'' are inserted into the new hash table as a key and value.   The order in which ''procedure'' is called for different associations is unspecified.

When a key has already been created in the hash table, the procedure ''merger'' is called with arguments ''oldkey oldvalue newkey newvalue'' and returns two values, the proper key and the proper value.

`(hash-table-for-each `''proc hash-table''`)`

Calls ''proc'' for every association in ''hash-table'' with two arguments: the key of the association and the value of the association.  The value returned by ''proc'' is discarded.   The order in which ''procedure'' is called for different associations is unspecified.  Returns an unspecified value.  (SRFI 69 `hash-table-walk` with the arguments reversed; Common Lisp `maphash`)

`(hash-table-update-each! `''proc hash-table''`)`

Calls ''proc'' for every association in ''hash-table'' with two arguments: the key of the association and the value of the association.  The value returned by ''proc'' is used to update the association.   Returns an unspecified value.  The order in which ''procedure'' is called for different associations is unspecified.

`(hash-table-map->list `''proc hash-table''`)`

Calls ''proc'' for every association in ''hash-table'' with two arguments: the key of the association and the value of the association.  The value returned by ''proc'' is accumulated into a list, which is returned.   The order in which ''procedure'' is called for different associations is unspecified.  

`(hash-table-fold `''proc''` `''init''` `''hash-table''`)`

Calls ''proc'' for every association in ''hash-table'' with three arguments: the key of the association, the value of the association, and an accumulated value ''val''.  ''Val'' is ''init'' for the first invocation of ''procedure'', and for subsequent invocations of ''procedure'', the returned value of the previous invocation.  The value returned by `hash-table-fold` is the return value of the last invocation of ''proc''. The order in which ''procedure'' is called for different associations is unspecified.  (SRFI 69 `hash-table-fold` has the ''hash-table'' as the first argument)

`(hash-table-unfold `''continue? mapper successor seed equivalence'' [ ''hash'' ]`)`

Create a new hash table as if by `make-hash-table`.  If the result of applying the predicate ''continue?'' to ''seed'' is `#f`, return the hash table.  Otherwise, apply the procedure ''mapper'' to ''seed''.  ''Mapper'' returns two values, which are inserted into the hash table as the key and the value respectively.  Then get a new seed by applying the procedure ''successor'' to ''seed'', and repeat this algorithm.

=== Copying and conversion ===

`(hash-table-copy `''hash-table''`)`

Returns a newly allocated hash table with the same properties and associations as ''hash-table''. (SRFI 69 `hash-table-copy`; R6RS `hashtable-copy`, passing `#t` as the second argument)

`(hash-table->alist `''hash-table''`)`

Returns an alist with the same associations as ''hash-table'' in an unspecified order.

`(alist->hash-table `''alist equivalence hash'')`

Returns a newly allocated hash-table as if by `make-hash-table`, initializing it from the associations of ''alist''.  (SRFI 69 `alist->hash-table`)

=== Hash tables as functions ===

The following procedures allow hash tables to be used as functions with mutable behavior.  In this way, for example, lists can be processed by `map` using the procedure returned from a hash table by `hash-table-accessor'.

`(hash-table-accessor `''hash-table'' [ ''failure'' [ ''success'' ] ]`)`

Curried version of `hash-table-ref`.  Returns a procedure of one argument, a key, which returns what `hash-table-ref` returns when invoked with the ''hashtable'' argument, the passed key, and the ''failure'' and ''success'' arguments.

`(hash-table-accessor/default `''hash-table default''`)`

Curried version of `hash-table-ref/default`.  Returns a procedure of one argument, a key, which returns what `hash-table-ref/default` returns when invoked with the ''hashtable'' argument, the passed key, and the ''default'' argument.

=== Hash tables as sets ===

`(hash-table-union! `''hash-table,,1,, hash-table,,2,,'' [ ''merger'' ]`)`

Adds the associations of ''hash-table,,2,,'' to ''hash-table,,1,,'' and returns it.  The values are merged using the result of invoking the ''merger'' procedure, which accepts the arguments ''key,,1,, value,,1,, key,,2,, value,,2,,'' and defaults to `(lambda (key1 value1 key2 value2) value2)`.  (SRFI 69 `hash-table-merge!`)

`(hash-table-intersection! `''hash-table,,1,, hash-table,,2,,'' [ ''merger'' ]`)`

Deletes the associations from ''hash-table,,1,,'' which don't also appear in ''hash-table,,2,,'' and returns ''hash-table,,1,,'', and merges the values of those that appear in both hash tables using the result of invoking the ''merger'' procedure, which accepts the arguments ''key,,1,, value,,1,, key,,2,, value,,2,,'' and defaults to `(lambda (key1 value1 key2 value2) value2)`.

`(hash-table-difference! `''hash-table,,1,, hash-table,,2,,''`)`

Deletes the keys of ''hash-table,,2,,'' from ''hash-table,,1,,'' and returns ''hash-table,,1,,''.

=== Exceptions ===

`(hash-table-not-found? `''obj''`)`

Returns `#t` if ''obj'' is an object raised by the `hash-table-ref` procedure or any other procedure that accesses hash tables when the key is not found and there is no failure procedure, and `#f` otherwise.

== Implementation ==

The sample implementation (''not yet written'') was originally intended to be easily layered over any existing hash table implementation, including the many that support either SRFI 69 or R6RS (there is an implementation of [https://code.launchpad.net/~scheme-libraries-team/scheme-libraries/srfi SRFI 69 on top of R6RS], plus all the native hash table systems mentioned in [#Sources Sources] above.  However, this turned out not to be practical for the following reasons:

* Racket and Gauche do not support arbitrary equivalence predicates, only `eq?`, `eqv?`, `equal?`, and `string=?`.

* S7 does not support arbitrary equivalence predicates: the implementation chooses a predicate based on the nature of the keys.

* Guile supports arbitrary equivalence predicates, but in that case the equivalence predicate and hash procedure must be passed explicitly to all the primitive procedures.  Consequently, hash tables corresponding to the present proposal would have to be records containing a Guile hash table, an equivalence predicate, and a hash procedure, which means that they could not interoperate directly with naked Guile hash tables.

* SISC, Scheme48/scsh, RScheme, Scheme 9, and Rep do not provide any procedure that copies a hash table, nor any way of inspecting it to determine its equivalence predicates and hash procedures so that it can be re-created.

* SLIB hash tables are vectors, not disjoint objects.

* !FemtoLisp supports only `equal?` as the equivalence predicate.

As a result, the sample implementation assumes the existence of a SRFI 69 implementation, and imports just the core procedures `make-hash-table`, `hash-table?`, `hash-table-ref/default`, `hash-table-set!`, `hash-table-delete!`, `hash-table-size`, `hash-table-walk`, and `hash-table-copy`.  New implementers who need to support the present proposal from scratch can take the implementations of these procedures from the SRFI 69 implementation and add them to this implementation.

To layer the implementation directly on top of R6RS, the corresponding procedures need to be imported from `(rnrs hashtables)`.  See the file `hash-tables.sls` in the implementation.   It should also be possible to adapt the sample implementation for use on MIT, Gambit, and Bigloo.

time

2013-05-27 07:52:25